Alyssa Vratsanos on Shakespeare and Language
A painting by Alyssa’s favourite post-impressionist, Vincent van Gogh |
William
Shakespeare: a name so often heard fall casually from the lips of your average
intellectual (and certainly pseudo-intellectual) type. Shakespeare is revered
in literary circles as some kind of deity, a purveyor of all that is right with
English and its literature. Abrasive ignorance, bad grammar, ill manners,
American brashness, and general uncouthness are nothing a spot of Hamlet can’t cure.
But
only a true enthusiast of the Bard will know that Shakespeare was anything but
a traditionalist, let alone a language prescriptivist. He was as linguistically
irreverent as Doctor Seuss. The way he used and manipulated the English
language is something to behold. Granted, he did a great many phenomenal things
with his talents, but for me – as a linguist-in-training – it seems only
fitting to commemorate the man with a tribute to his use of language.
I
was always the first person to correct a person’s use of “their”/“there”/“they’re,” and argue in favour of the Oxford comma, but that’s not what language is in
essence. It’s not an unchangeable bit of software that gets uploaded to our
brains, nor is it a code of rules we dare not break. We created language to do
our bidding, so to speak, and so it is only fitting that we reshape it as
needed to suit our surroundings. Shakespeare, with his unorthodox syntax and
invented idioms, was just doing what people have been doing since the utterance
of the first meaningful syllable.
I
admire him because he saw no limits in what he could do with, and therefore to,
the language. He set the scene for future writers to be innovative and
disregard what is correct or proper. Will was doing all of this before the
likes of E.E. Cummings and Allen Ginsberg made it cool. He is the founding father
of hipsterdom: the epitome of forward-thinking ingenuity (with a beard and
funky earring to boot), long before all the other kids were doing it.
Shakespeare’s irreverence for the rules of English has always stuck out for me
in stark contrast to the stuffy old academic types who taught him to me at university.
Shakespeare
is not the catalyst for stiff-upper-lipped grammar nazism, he is the antidote.
Alyssa Vratsanos is an Honours student in Linguistics at the University of the Witwatersrand.
Image: www.en.wikipedia.org
No comments:
Post a Comment
Enter your unrestrained arguments here