I was shocked to read that Kalushi: The Story of Solomon Mahlangu, Mandla Dube’s directorial debut, cost more than R20 million to make. This was reported in an article from January by Gali Mbele in the Sunday Times. The figure is particularly dismaying because I know that no narrative South African film has ever grossed that much money at the box office; Kalushi, which is by no means a record-breaking film, couldn’t hope to gross that much, and, since many deductions have to be made for expenses and other agreed costs, as well as the distributor’s and theatres’ portions of the income, will never make back that huge budget. (So far, Kalushi has grossed about R1.2 million in theatres.)
It drew my attention to the
financial matters of film-making in South Africa. How easy is it for a
first-time director, such as Dube, to secure the resources he needs to make his
film? Does it differ between different kinds of films? How much easier is it
for experienced directors with careers and reputations behind them? Perhaps
even more importantly, how does this supposed struggle for funding and whatever
sources for funding as may be found affect what ends up on the screen?
Mbele reports that the main institutions that film-makers can apply to for
financial support are the National Film and Video Foundation, the Department of
Trade and Industry, the National Lottery Commission, the Industrial Development
Corporation, and the Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal film commissions. So far as I
can tell, each of these entities is owned and operated by the state; to what
extent is the state being allowed – by grim financial necessity – to intervene
in the works of local film-makers?

